- DI & DS
- English Language
- GK
-
Intelligence & CR
- Alphabet & Number Ranking
- Analytical Reasoning
- Blood Relations Test
- Coding - Decoding
- Comparision of Ranks
- Direction Sense Test
- Mathematical Operation / Number Puzzles
- Series
- Sitting Arrangement
- Statement and Arguement
- Statement and Conclusion
- Statement and Course of Action
- Statement-Assumption
- Syllogism
-
Mathematical Skills
- Average
- Calender
- Clocks
- Geometry
- Height and Distance
- Logarithms
- Mensuration
- Mixtures and Alligations
- Number System
- Percentage
- Permutation and Computation
- Probability
- Profit and Loss
- Ratio and Proportion
- Set Theory
- Simple calculations
- Simple Equations
- Simple Interest and Compound Interest
- Time and Work
- Time, Speed and Distance
-
175.
Answer the questions based on the following information.
Mr. Mansingh has five sons – Arun, Mahi, Rohit, Nilesh and Saurav, and three daughters – Tamanna, Kuntala and Janaki. Three sons of Mr. Mansingh were born first followed by two daughters. Saurav is the eldest child and Janki is the youngest. Three of the children are studying at Trinity School and three are studying at St. Stefan. Tamanna and Rohit study at St. Stefan school. Kuntala, the eldest daughter, plays chess. Mansorover school offers cricket only, while Trinity school offers chess. Beside, these schools offer no other games. The children who are at Mansorover school have been born in succession. Mahi and Nilesh are cricketers while Arun plays football. Rohit who was born just before Janki, plays hockey.[1] Arun is the _________ child of Mr. Mansingh.
A. 2nd
B. 3rd
C. 6th
D. 5th[2] Saurav is a student of which school?
A. Trinity
B. St. Stefan
C. Mansorover
D. Cannot be determined[3] What game does Tamanna play?
A. Cricket
B. Hockey
C. Football
D. Cannot be determined[4] Which of the following pairs was not born in succession (ignore the order)?
A. Mahi and Nilesh
B. Kuntala and Arun
C. Rohit and Janki
D. Arun and Rohitasked in IIFT
View Comments [0 Reply]
-
176.
Answer the questions based on the following information.
Five women decided to go for shopping to South Extension, New Delhi. They arrived at the designated meeting place in the following order: 1. Aradhana, 2. Chandrima, 3. Deepika, 4. Heena and 5. Sumitra. Each of them spent at least Rs. 1000. The woman who spent Rs. 2234 arrived before the woman who spent Rs. 1193. One of them spent Rs. 1340 and she was not Deepika. One woman spent Rs. 1378 more than Chandrima. One of them spent Rs. 2517 and she was not Aradhana. Heena spent more than Deepika. Sumitra spent the largest amount and Chandrima the smallest.[1] What was the amount spent by Heena?
A. Rs. 1193
B. Rs. 1340
C. Rs. 2234
D. Rs. 2517[2] Which of the following amount is spent by one of the women?
A. Rs. 1139
B. Rs. 1378
C. Rs. 2571
D. Rs. 2518[3] The lady who spent Rs. 1193 is:
A. Aradhana
B. Chandrima
C. Deepika
D. Heenaasked in IIFT
View Comments [0 Reply]
-
177.
Answer the questions based on the following information.
Director of an institute wants to distribute teaching assignments of HRM, Psychology, Development Studies, Trade policy and Finance to five of six newly appointed faculty members. Prof. Fotedar does not want any assignment if Prof. Das gets one of the five. Prof. Chaudhury desires either HRM or Finance or no assignment. Prof. Banik opines that if Prof. Das gets either Psychology or Trade Policy then she must get the other one. Prof. Eswar insists on an assignment if Prof. Acharya gets one.[1] Which of the following is valid faculty – assignment combination if all the faculty preferences are considered?
A. Prof. Acharya - HRM, Prof. Banik – Psychology, Prof. Chaudhury – Development studies, Prof. Das – Trade Policy, Prof. Eswar – Finance
B. Prof. Chaudhury - HRM, Prof. Das – Psychology, Prof. Acharya – Development studies, Prof. Banik – Trade Policy, Prof. Eswar – Finance
C. Prof. Acharya - HRM, Prof. Banik – Psychology, Prof. Eswar – Development studies, Prof. Das – Trade Policy, Prof. Fotedar – Finance
D. Prof. Banik - HRM, Prof. Fotedar – Psychology, Prof. Eswar – Development studies, Prof. Chaudhuri – Trade Policy, Prof. Acharya – Finance[2] If Prof. Acharya gets HRM and Prof. Chaudhury gets Finance, then which of the following is not a correct faculty-assignment combination assuming all faculty preferences are considered?
A. Prof. Das – Development Studies, Prof. Banik – Trade Policy
B. Prof. Fotedar – Development Studies, Prof. Banik – Trade Policy
C. Prof. Banik – Development Studies, Prof. Eswar – Trade Policy
D. Prof. Banik – Development Studies, Prof. Das – Trade Policylast reply by CpjJwWHV • 13 years ago • asked in IIFT
View Comments [1 Reply]
-
178.